java - Parcelable vs Serializable - for classes without any fields -

java - Parcelable vs Serializable - for classes without any fields -

often have pass fragment (or activity) interface instance without internal data. pass fragment (or activity), should write bundle (or intent) parcelable or serializable. take these 2 options ?

example:

public class somefragment { public static interface helper { view prepareview(somefragment fragment, layoutinflater inflater); // etc. } @override public view oncreateview(layoutinflater inflater, viewgroup container, bundle savedinstancestate) { homecoming extracthelperfromarguments().prepareview(this, inflater); } public static somefragment newinstance(helper helper) { somefragment fragment = new somefragment(); // // bundle args = new bundle(); // // args.putparcelable(key_helper, (parcelable) helper); // or // args.putserializable(key_helper, (serializable) helper); // ? // // fragment.setarguments(args) homecoming fragment; } }

if take parcelable have declare static field creator , empty methods describecontents() , writetoparcel() (empty because class doesn't have fields).

if take serializable don't have anything.

sorry english

hi here link after reading have no more questions regarding parcelable vs serializable..

link

java android serialization parcelable